« Weighing the Options | Main | State of the Union 2007 »

January 23, 2007

Broad Brushes

If this is true, you've really got to wonder about their hiring practices. It is an amusing reminder, however, of one of the reasons those of us in the military tend to look askance at claims by those on the left that they're really the preferred solution for the troops.

That's not really fair, of course. I think the vast majority of Democrats are decent people who want nothing but the best for our troops. I think that's true of Republicans as well. The problem, as it usually does, comes from the fringes, where a few knuckleheads can ruin things for everyone. When it comes to the military, the Democrats suffer because their fringers (or, many times, people well to the left of the Democrats) tend to like to denigrate the military. This attitude isn't common among Democrats (although I'd wager that it is more common than the Democrats like to admit), but it is the kind of thing that draws attention, and contrary to what advertisers will tell you, there is such a thing as bad publicity.

I imagine that this will get a bit of play in the blogosphere as the prowar side attempts to tar the antiwar side with claims of not supporting the troops and so on, but I do hope not. One of the more basic freedoms we're supposed to enjoy in this country, and one the right used to stand for, is the right to be judged for who we are, not for who someone who is in some way affiliated with us is. Yep, the person who wrote that email was an insensitive boob who deserves whatever censure he or she gets. But trying to use that stupidity as a means to tar an entire side of the argument is puerile and worthless.

Look at it this way: no matter where you stand politically, I'll wager I can find someone who agrees with you who is also an idiot. Do you really want to be judged by the lowest common denominator?

Posted at January 23, 2007 09:31 AM

Andrew Olmsted

Comment policy

I apologize for only allowing authenticated commenters, but comment spam overwhelms the site if I don't use those measures to prevent it. I reserve the right to delete any comment, although generally comments will only be deleted due to use of profanity or personal attacks on people. I have no objection to vigorous argument, but when name-calling begins, I'm putting a stop to it. In the immortal words of Eugene Levy, "People, people, let's stop this before somebody says something untrue!" If you want to call people names, I recommend you get your own blog.

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://andrewolmsted.com/mt/pings.cgi/1634

Comments

You really don't know the political affliation of the person who sent the email, or even if he has ever bothered to vote. It is nonsensical to claim, as partisans on both sides tend to do routinely, that the words or actions of one person, acting as an individual in private life, are representative of everyone who leans toward any political ideology or of everyone who identifies with or is part of any political organization.

Did Timothy McVeigh represent "the Right" or typical political attitudes of those who have served in the military? Of course not.

Someone who thinks the war is a mistake -- Rightwing America Firster? Leftwing Pacifist? Apolitical jerk? Who knows? -- acts like a rude jerk. It doesn't tell us anything about him EXCEPT that he is a rude jerk.

Posted by: esmense [TypeKey Profile Page] at January 25, 2007 09:02 AM

Fair enough. I'm not sure that disputes the general thrust of my post, however. Indeed, I'm fairly certain that much of your first paragraph affirms it.

Posted by: Andrew [TypeKey Profile Page] at January 25, 2007 09:08 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?