|
« The Day After | Main | Heading East » November 08, 2006Rumsfeld OutA hypothetical Republicans will be asking a lot in the next few months: had President Bush accepted Secretary Rumsfeld's resignation in October rather than November, would yesterday's Democratic victory have been as strong? Hypotheticals are fun because they can't be proven, but this one seems pretty reasonable. A factor in the Republican losses yesterday was frustration over the perception the Bush administration wasn't responding to the situation on the ground in Iraq. And Secretary Rumsfeld was at the center of that controversy, a lightning rod for criticism about the administration's policies as the man who ostensibly created and implemented those policies. Had President Bush gotten rid of him earlier, it doesn't seem unreasonable to think that might have move enough votes to change a few races, notably those in Montana and Virginia. In any case, while removing Rumsfeld is a wise decision, it may be too late to matter. With the Democrats basking in their victory, it's difficult to predict how they'll treat nominee Robert Gates during his confirmation hearings. Assuming he is confirmed, will he change course in Iraq, or will the name plate change but the policy remain the same? I am not at all convinced that there is much that we can do in Iraq that will help us succeed at this point, although I do hope that there is. But for this to make any difference, it will have to involve real changes in policy, and not just removing the lightning rod. Think of it this way: if you take the lightning rod off the house, but you continue to live in an area prone to storms, the lightning is just going to hit something else. Posted at November 8, 2006 01:53 PM
Comment policyI apologize for only allowing authenticated commenters, but comment spam overwhelms the site if I don't use those measures to prevent it. I reserve the right to delete any comment, although generally comments will only be deleted due to use of profanity or personal attacks on people. I have no objection to vigorous argument, but when name-calling begins, I'm putting a stop to it. In the immortal words of Eugene Levy, "People, people, let's stop this before somebody says something untrue!" If you want to call people names, I recommend you get your own blog. Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsSaw a couple of interesting comments on this over at theforvm.org (one from a lib, one from a con): (harley) According to Matthews, Cheney barracked for Rummy, but Bush would not listen. Then Cheney tried to put a neo-con firebreather in his place. Bush wouldn't listen. He brought in a foreign policy realist from his Dad's admin. instead.
Posted by: kenb Whoa. How'd that paragraph get all red and stuff? Posted by: kenb I'm still puzzled by the timing of Rumsfeld's departure. Would Rumsfeld's bowing out a few weeks or months before the election helped the GOP? Presumably the downside would've been admitting failure in Iraq, a conclusion that voters have already reached. It would've helped, or at least not hurt (hindsight being 20/20). The election was a slap upside President Bush's head, the voters' way of saying deal with reality. A pre-November firing Rummy would've looked like he was doing just that. Posted by: ckreiz Post a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) |