|
« The Thrill is Gone | Main | The Price of Collectivism » April 30, 2005Sgrena's 'Lies'Captain Ed points to a report that shows that the car carrying Italian journalist Giuliana Sgrena was not travelling at a sedate 30 MPH as she claimed but in fact was moving out at roughly 60 MPH. At that speed, it is hardly surprising that the soldiers manning the checkpoint engaged the car. This does not necessarily mean that Sgrena lied, however. While I would bet that way were I forced to do so, these kinds of claims strike me as little more than the converse of the claims that 'Bush lied.' In each case there is now evidence to suggest that claims the speaker made were factually inaccurate. President Bush was incorrect in stating that Iraq had major WMD stockpiles, and Sgrena was incorrect in claiming that her car was moving at 30 MPH. For them to have lied, however, we would have to be able to demonstrate that they knew their statements were factually inaccurate at the time they made them. I have yet to see any evidence of this in President Bush's case, and I'm afraid that the same is true in Ms. Sgrena's case. Sgrena had just been released by terrorists. It was dark and her focus was likely not on how fast the car was travelling. Depending on the make of the car, the condition of the road, and what she was doing at the time, it is quite conceivable she thought she was travelling faster or slower than the car was actually moving. I suspect most of us have driven cars that are so smooth we don't realize we're travelling as fast as we actually are; I know that I have. It is therefore hardly surprising to me that Sgrena might have gotten the speed of the vehicle wrong when we consider that the last thing she was probably focusing on was how fast the vehicle was moving. Sgrena was wrong, and it's certainly plausible to speculate that her anti-American animus helped to motivate her to place the shooting in the worst possible light. That is not proof that she lied, however, any more than the fact President Bush's belief that removing Saddam Hussein from power probably helped him to accept the CIA's erroneous reports of Iraqi WMDs at face value somehow proves that he lied about them. Rather than tossing inflammatory claims around, better to address the issues at hand. The Italian vehicle was almost certainly fired up because it was approaching an American checkpoint at high speed and the soldiers manning the checkpoint reacted as they were trained to do. The soldiers have been cleared of wrongdoing in the attack, which seems to be the right decision and at least guarantees that no further harm will come out of what appears to have been a tragic accident. Posted at April 30, 2005 03:41 PM
Comment policyI apologize for only allowing authenticated commenters, but comment spam overwhelms the site if I don't use those measures to prevent it. I reserve the right to delete any comment, although generally comments will only be deleted due to use of profanity or personal attacks on people. I have no objection to vigorous argument, but when name-calling begins, I'm putting a stop to it. In the immortal words of Eugene Levy, "People, people, let's stop this before somebody says something untrue!" If you want to call people names, I recommend you get your own blog. Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsI remember Giuliana Sgrena stating it carefully - basically and actually saying (very soon after her freedom was established) - I don't "think" we were going very fast. Posted by: chrys at April 30, 2005 08:14 PM Yes, this is all true. But the people who are throwing around the "liar" accusation are doing so because they don't particularly care for Bush/Sgrena. I don't expect either camp to back off their accusations any time soon. I personally think Sgrena is so full of herself its hard for me to give her the benefit of doubt. Even if she didn't lie, she's still an idiot and its tragic someone had to die to save her life. Posted by: Jessicarrot at May 10, 2005 09:46 PM I agree as far as Sgrena being an idiot, plus wanting to be the center of attention. My opinion also being she gave the impression of "Poor me, I'm the innocent victim here" Posted by: amborg at July 6, 2005 05:49 AM Post a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) |