|
« Sleep Is For the Weak | Main | Stupid, Really Stupid, and Francona Stupid » October 14, 2004Killing the Golden GooseStephen Green hits the nail on the head. No excerpts, and no comment. Just go read it. Now.Posted at October 14, 2004 11:44 AM
Comment policyI apologize for only allowing authenticated commenters, but comment spam overwhelms the site if I don't use those measures to prevent it. I reserve the right to delete any comment, although generally comments will only be deleted due to use of profanity or personal attacks on people. I have no objection to vigorous argument, but when name-calling begins, I'm putting a stop to it. In the immortal words of Eugene Levy, "People, people, let's stop this before somebody says something untrue!" If you want to call people names, I recommend you get your own blog. Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsI don't like the way either party is doing the election, but try to provide a balanced argument. Say why one action is worse than the other, don't just talk about one action. He could have talked about the Florida State Patrol questioning elderly black voters who are part of the group that promotes absentee voting. What about trying to get voters purged from the rolls for being inactive, even though no proof was provided that they met the criteria to be dropped. Both parties should be ashamed of themselves, but power will always beat fairness in politics. At least as long as the voters don't demand more from their representatives. Posted by: Scott at October 14, 2004 12:07 PM I don't condone his attitude, but I wonder what you think of the substance of his response to Stephen Green's essay: http://tbogg.blogspot.com/2004/10/mind-fogged-by-alcohol.html Posted by: Liama at October 14, 2004 03:04 PM Both parties are guilty. Today's Paul Krogman column in the New York Times includes a long list of Republican offenses, from tearing up Democratic registration forms to efforts to reject applications of black Democrats in Florida. No wonder so many people think their votes don't matter. Posted by: Heather at October 15, 2004 07:57 AM I live in Wisconsin, near Milwaukee. On the news the last few days the reporters are talking about how one segment in Milwaukee wants to have 2.5 million ballots available. Since the city only has 700,000 total population there can be only one reason for the extra ballots. I suspect,as in Illinois in 1960 [Chicago waited to report its vote until the downstate vote, read Republican, was all in], the vote in Milwaukee will be the last one reported on November 2. And, suprise, surprise, there will be just enough Kerry votes to carry the state. Posted by: dad at October 15, 2004 09:54 AM Maybe they are asking for the extra ballots in response to other people's efforts to create a shortage? From Krugman's column: "But in Wisconsin, a Republican county executive insists that this year, when everyone expects a record turnout, Milwaukee will receive fewer ballots than it got in 2000 or 2002 - a recipe for chaos at polling places serving urban, mainly Democratic voters." Posted by: Heather at October 15, 2004 11:33 AM Post a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) |