|
« De-Nazification | Main | The Tipping Point? » February 07, 2007Shutting Down DebateJonathan Swift wrote, "It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into." I think that most of us realize that overcoming belief is a hard thing to do, and it is one of the reasons it is so difficult for people to think critically. This is never more painfully obvious than when discussing religion, regardless of which side one is arguing for; I have argued with atheists and religious devotees alike, and the only difference I have seen in many of their arguments is the end state. But then, that may be due to my own agnosticism. What I do find particularly frustrating, however, are the attempts by zealots to bury or suppress evidence that might be damaging to their cause, like the current attempts by Kenyan Christians to block the display of various fossils that help to illustrate the evolution of various species, including our own. As should be obvious by now, it's pretty easy for people to believe what they want about complex science like evolution. I know many highly intelligent people who dispute the theory of evolution (and don't get me started on the whole 'it's only a theory' debate), claiming gaps in the fossil record and other such arguments that allow them to retain their faith by denying evolution. And I don't bother to get too worked up about it; not being a scientist, I tend to accept evolution on faith of a sort as well. As do most people, I suspect; few of us have the spare time to confirm even a fraction of the theories that scientists put forth, so for the most part we just accept that they're doing their job to the best of their ability. This is why consensus matters (sometimes more than it should) in science: when one scientist argues that X leads to Y, that doesn't mean much. When many scientists argue that X leads to Y, we tend to assume that they're on to something. This helps to explain both why I think anthropogenic warming is occurring and why I tend to hope that it is. But when it comes to putting the evidence out there, I have no sympathy for those who would suppress what they don't like. I may think Bill Arkin's a leftist anti-military jerk, but I wouldn't approve of anyone preventing him from demonstrating that as many times as he seems to think are necessary, nor would I countenance any attempts to prevent those who disagree with me from explaining why Arkin really loves the troops. And so I have no sympathy whatsoever for Kenyan Christians who seem to be afraid that their faith is built on such a fragile house of cards that the display of a few fossils will cause it to come tumbling down. If that's really the case, they have bigger things to worry about than what's being shown in the local museums. Posted at February 7, 2007 07:33 AM
Comment policyI apologize for only allowing authenticated commenters, but comment spam overwhelms the site if I don't use those measures to prevent it. I reserve the right to delete any comment, although generally comments will only be deleted due to use of profanity or personal attacks on people. I have no objection to vigorous argument, but when name-calling begins, I'm putting a stop to it. In the immortal words of Eugene Levy, "People, people, let's stop this before somebody says something untrue!" If you want to call people names, I recommend you get your own blog. Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsEvolution and the evidence for it are some of the strongest and easiest-to-grasp features of science. I could hardly begin to give a non-scientist a good working understanding of the standard model of particle physics, but you can go into a lab and see evolution happening - or walk into a night club, or a trading floor, or watch a nature video. You'd have to think all of modern genetics an elaborate hoax to doubt it. Posted by: rilkefan I know this comment doesn't address the primary point of your article, but personally, I don't think the existence of evolution conflicts with my understanding of the Bible. The idea that all species came from one seems to, but not the existence of evolution in general. Posted by: Chance Post a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) |