« The Health Care Dilemma | Main | 6 June 1944: Remembering D-Day »

June 05, 2006

What Really Matters

"Suppose I were a member of Congress. And suppose I was an idiot. But, I repeat myself."

Mark Twain

Mr. Twain was insufficiently cynical about our nominal servants in Washington. At a time when federal spending appears to be the proverbial unstoppable force, when we are fighting a war on two fronts in Iraq and Afghanistan while negotiating to prevent the eruption of war on a third front in Iran, when the nation is concerned about how to deal with the millions of individuals seeking to gain entry to the United States, while our military forces are trying to scrimp and save every penny they can because Congress has yet to pass a continuing resolution, our government has stepped up to take on the most important issue of the day: a constitutional amendment to prevent the horrors of gay marriage from wreaking havoc on our shores.

It is a tough thing. My brother lives in Massachusetts, and while he doesn't come right out and say it, when we talk I can hear the strain in his voice from the knowledge his marriage was devalued by the Massachusetts Supreme Court's decision to legalize gay marriage. And we all know that the mainstream media, dominated as it is by effete liberal snobs, is not permitting news of the riots against gay marriage that are tearing through the streets of places like Provincetown to reach our ears. I have it on good authority that straight couples are divorcing at record rates since the gay marriage law went into effect, but you'd never hear that in the papers. Anarchy and mass hysteria are not news if they stand in opposition to progressive goals.

I suppose I'm being too harsh. I have some sympathy for those who oppose gay marriage. I don't agree with their beliefs, but I think I can understand them. Marriage is a tool societies use to encourage monogamy, which in turn helps societies produce reasonably trouble-free children. (Obviously there are plenty of children from single parents who turn out just fine, and there are children of happily married couples who turn out disasters, but overall the odds favor children with two parents.) And gay marriage is a big break with the past. I respect those who prefer to take their time when deciding to change societal institutions. And I have nothing but sympathy for those who are outraged by courts that decide that after two-plus centuries, suddenly the law means that gay marriages are now not only can be allowed, but must be allowed.

Still, while I can sympathize with them, I find it difficult to believe that gay marriage is an issue that ought to be occupying very much time in our elected representatives' schedule, given the other issues we have on our plate. I don't know if this is just a desperate attempt by the Republican party to try and hold onto the Congress or if President Bush and the Republican leadership honestly believe this is a vital national issue. In either case, they continue to make an excellent case for throwing them all out on their ear. If they are cynically hoping that a vote on a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage will keep the Congress in Republican hands, then they deserve to be thrown out because they're not sent to Washington to waste our time and money on political stunt. (Yes, I know that they do that all the time, but that doesn't mean we should encourage them.) If they honestly think this is an issue that merits more attention than the war or the budget, then their priorities are severely out of order and they need to be thrown out in the hopes that perhaps their replacements will have a somewhat more appropriate set of priorities. In any case, it's time for a sea change in Washington.

Posted at June 5, 2006 03:54 PM

Andrew Olmsted

Advertisers

Cat Medicine
Refrigerator Repair Parts
Best Price Cars
Account Money Market
Detailing Supplies

Comment policy

I apologize for only allowing authenticated commenters, but comment spam overwhelms the site if I don't use those measures to prevent it. I reserve the right to delete any comment, although generally comments will only be deleted due to use of profanity or personal attacks on people. I have no objection to vigorous argument, but when name-calling begins, I'm putting a stop to it. In the immortal words of Eugene Levy, "People, people, let's stop this before somebody says something untrue!" If you want to call people names, I recommend you get your own blog.

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://andrewolmsted.com/mt/pings.cgi/1200

Comments

Or global warming. We could be working on how to deal with that.

I'm sorry about your brother's unhappiness and the disrespct with which he was treated. I can't see this issue as anything except an appeal to religiously-based prejudice for political advantage. Except I don't think it will work to the advantage of the Republicans. I think people are getting sick of these substanceless appeals to baser emotions, Hope so, anyway.

Posted by: lily at June 5, 2006 07:29 PM

Thanks for your concern Lily, but I think Andrew was having a little fun using me as a sarcastic foil. I assure you my marriage is unblemished by the many gay marriages taking place within my State. The riots are a pain in the a** though.

Unfair of you to have sport with me whilst I cannot comment Andrew!

Posted by: Enrak at June 6, 2006 07:05 AM

Yes, the paragraph talking about my brother was intended to poke fun at the anti-gay marriage folks' worst fears. I guess I should stick to straight punditry and leave humor to others.

Posted by: Andrew Olmsted at June 6, 2006 07:43 AM

Bush is pandering to the religious right to make sure they get out and vote, and he's trying to boost his pathetic approval ratings with this distraction from everything else that is going on.

There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that years from now we'll look back on those who opposed gay marriage the same way we now look back on those who supported banning inter-racial marriage.

Posted by: Heather at June 6, 2006 09:40 AM

So glad you clarified that you were kidding in that one paragraph. You had me worried... Much more happy with the tone you finish the post. I agree - either side of the aisle you sit on, this is a stupid issue for Congress to be debating at this point in time. Let the states handle it.

Posted by: J. at June 7, 2006 09:23 AM

"And we all know that the mainstream media, dominated as it is by effete liberal snobs, is not permitting news of the riots against gay marriage that are tearing through the streets of places like Provincetown to reach our ears."

Y'all are kidding that you thought this paragraph was serious, right?

"riots AGAINST gay marriage" in Provincetown?

You're just having us on.

Posted by: Enrak at June 7, 2006 09:39 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?